Tuesday, February 09, 2010  
Search by keyword
Breaking News Alerts
Enter your email address to receive Breaking News Alerts
Quick Poll
Do you agree with the non-smoking ordinance adopted by the City of Batesville?

 

South Panola schools run gamut in latest test scores

By Rupert Howell
South Panola School District has been labeled “Academic Watch” under the recently released statewide accountability system with two of four schools rated At-risk of Failing, one rated Successful and one rated High Performing.

Under the new system, schools are rated as Failing, At-risk of Failing, Low Performing, Academic Watch, Successful, High Performing and Star District.

Factors determining the rating include Quality of Distribution Index, or QDI, a representation of the distribution of students’ scores across state-wide tests.

A second factor is Growth Status, a measurement tool recording whether students have received a year’s worth of learning from the previous year.

The district as a whole scored 141 on QDI which is measured on a scale of 0-300 with 300 being highest. The state average QDI is 149. Growth was not met district-wide according to the report.

School Superintendent Dr. Keith Shaffer told school board trustees the overall ranking was equivalent to a ranking of “three” under the previous system at last Thursday’s board meeting.

South Panola High School ranked High Performing with an 80.60% High School Completion Rate and 180 on QDI.

High school students also scored well by scoring proficient and advanced in subject area testing in Algebra I -67%; biology-76%; English II-55%; and U.S. History-74%.

Pope Elementary met Growth and was ranked successful with a QDI of 149.

Batesville Junior High and Batesville Middle School were both ranked At-risk of Failing and neither met  academic growth standards.  

Batesville Junior High’s QDI was 132 and Batesville Middle School’s was 122.

Only grades 3-8 are given the Mississippi Curriculum Test II which is used to measure learning activity. Grade three at Batesville Middle School had a QDI of 155 which would rank it as successful according to Shaffer, who explained that those students had no previous MCT2 test from which to compare whether learning growth was met.


Visitor Comments
 
Submitted By: John Submitted: 11/24/2009
Does it not bother anyone that on a 0-300 scale, 149 is considered "satisfactory"? Or that 180 is considered "high"? Wake up Mississippians! The educational establishment in this state is continually trying to pull the wool over our eyes! They tell us that our local high school is performing at a "high" level, yet where does this high schol rank when compared to other high schools in the southeastern U.S. or with high schools across the entire USA? Do a little research on this subject, folks. You won't be happy with what you find. For years, Mississippi has annualy ranked at or just above the bottom when compared to other states. It's past time that we hold these local and state educational "experts" accountable. Is it not obvious that our "experts" don't have the needed expertise?


Submitted By: WILLIE Submitted: 11/24/2009
LOOKS LIKE THE ADMINISTRATION NEEDS TO LOOK AT THE JR HIGH AND MIDDLE SCHOOL. THE MIDDLE SCHOOL SEEMS TO HAVE MAJOR PROBLEMS IN THE ADMINISTRATION. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE NEEDS TO BE CHANGES MADE. THE MIDDLE SCHOOL ALWAYS HAS VERY LOW SCORES. WITH THE KIND OF MONEY THE CITIZENS PAY IN TAXES FOR THE SCHOOLS, IT LOOKS LIKE WE ARE NOT GETTING OUR MONEY'S WORTH.


Submitted By: earl Submitted: 11/24/2009
Dear John, Do a little research yourself. The new accountability model that rates our schools is aligned to national standards. A school rated successful is at the national average. When our high school is rated at HIGH Performing it is ABOVE the national average and is currently rated above the former LEVEL 5's such as Oxford High School, Tupelo High School,Water Valley High, New Albany High and Pontotoc City High School, I believe the teachers, staff, administrators and student body need to be commended for doing a good job.


Submitted By: John Submitted: 11/25/2009
Earl: Today, we live in a global economy. We compete for jobs against people in other countries. How do our HS graduates compare (especially in the area of math and science) to those in foreign lands? Let's just say we've been sliding downhill for the last 20 to 30 years. It's sort of ironic that for his first state dinner, President Obama's welcomed Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as his guest. In decades past, Indians viewed American colleges and universities as THE place to send their top HS graduates. This is no longer true. The top Indian high school graduates (going on to major in the areas of math and science) no longer have American schools at the top of their wish list. I won't bother to address the situation with other Asian high school performances. We've fallen off the pace in this area, yet we continue to not be alarmed.


Submitted By: Earl Submitted: 11/26/2009
John: I agree that not only our schools but country has room for improvement. I have looked at the new accountability standards for our schools and feel like the bar has been raised. Furthermore, it ia apparent that SPHS has made considerable strides. You spewed negaitivity about our schools and morover the high school. When I addressed the national standards that the new model you then started talking about international standards. In the United States we allocate a tremendous ammount of resources to educate all. Over the last few years the United States has posted highest graduation rates on record. Twenty to thirty years ago kids dropped out at will. In India only 1/3 and in China 1/2 of the students make it to high school. Additionally, the latest Science Technology Engineering and Math STEMS research suggests that we have ample levels of high level math and science students. However, they are going into the medical, business and banking fields (highest paying fields).




Current conditions
32°F
Light Snow
Batesville, MS
Radar & More >>
Advertisers
click ad below for details
 
View All Ads